Showing posts with label knowledge. Show all posts
Showing posts with label knowledge. Show all posts

Thursday, June 14, 2012

The Knowledge Stream Keeps Inching Closer

I first mentioned the Knowledge Stream in my project list post.  In case you didn't get to read about it, the Knowledge Stream is a network of neural implants.  The idea is that all human knowledge could be shared instantaneously, without being restricted to a certain language.  The Stream would contain representations of information and concepts in a form mirroring that of your brain itself.

Anyone could subscribe to any feed of knowledge and get updates as they are published.  Likewise, anyone could search the Stream simply by thinking about the question or topic.

Anyway, the reason I'm writing about it again is because since the last post, there have been so many articles that are related to this.  They each cover a piece of the technology required.  Here is the latest one in which researchers created neural implants that are powered by your own body chemistry:

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2405796,00.asp

I'm telling you, it's going to happen!

Saturday, November 5, 2011

[Mis]application

I've been meaning to write this post for a while, but, as usual, I couldn't clarify my thoughts well enough.  However, just now, I was swinging in a hammock in a penthouse in Copacabana and the ideas started to solidify.  They are not completely solid yet, but here we go anyway:

The difference between knowledge and wisdom is application.  You can know something, but until you apply it, it really doesn't do any good.

For example, mankind has gained tremendous knowledge of natural laws, but is the application of these laws that leads to useful innovations.  An obvious example is electricity.  It's great to study how electricity works, but until you actually do something with it, it doesn't provide any benefit.  What would you rather have?  A book full of formulas like V=IR, or, I don't know, lights in your house?

So application is extremely important.  And really, the example of natural laws is overly simplistic.  Their application is easy.  With electricity, you can easily make a circuit and test it.  If it works, you have successfully applied your knowledge.  It becomes much more difficult when we have to apply some bit of knowledge in our own life.

And herein is the reason I'm writing this post: I have seen a lot of misapplication lately.  More times than I care to count, I have seen people take a bit of advice, an analogy, an illustration, or even a personal experience, and misapply it.  (I don't want to give specific examples, so I apologize if this is overly vague.)

I'm sure they are not doing this on purpose.  In fact, they are to be commended for seeing a useful bit of knowledge and trying to apply it in their life.  But they are missing the mark.

I've spent a lot of time trying to determine why, exactly, they are missing it.  Sometimes it is failure to consider the context.  Sometimes it's oversimplification - or overcomplication - of the situation.  Sometimes it's simply seeing what they want to see.  If there is a single, unifying reason, I have yet to find it.

So I really don't have any conclusions yet.  Since I started noticing this in others, I've really tried to examine my own application to make sure its valid.  I guess that's all I have right now.  I would like to revisit this once I learn more...